A crack running through a rendered element and opening wider towards the edge, with an inspection probe alongside for scale
Court Cases
Case file · Court of Appeal

Your builder's warranty insurance may have expired before you bought the house. A Court of Appeal decision has confirmed it.

In March 2026 the Victorian Court of Appeal set aside a $176,297.76 award to a homeowner. He bought an established house, found defects, and claimed on the builder's warranty policy. The cover for the kind of defect he found had run out eighteen months before he owned the place.

Published: 10 August 2026
Where: Court of Appeal of Victoria
Read time: ~9 min
Key facts
Case
VBA v Fall-Armytage
[2026] VSCA 32
Court
Court of Appeal of Victoria
Niall CJ and McLeish and Whelan JJA
Decided
6 March 2026
appeal allowed
At stake
$176,297.76
trial award, set aside
Non-structural cover
2 years
from completion of the work
Other causes
6 years
from completion of the work
Key takeaways
Cover responds to when the loss happens, not when the defect was built in. That is the whole decision.
Non-structural defects carried two years from completion. Here the window closed on 18 November 2016, and the purchaser did not own the property until 10 May 2018.
Standing is not a remedy. Section 9 lets a later owner sue on the builder's warranties. It does not let them recover the previous owner's loss. You must prove your own.
The clause every summary quoted dropped its tail: cover can also end at the date the building contract was terminated, whichever comes first.

01The arithmetic

Four dates decide this case. Nothing else about it is complicated.

October 2013
The house is contracted
Amkor Investments Pty Ltd contracts Andrew Handbury Pty Ltd to build a dwelling at Caulfield South. QBE issues the domestic building insurance policy the following month.
18 November 2014
The works are completed, and both clocks start
Two years for non-structural defects. Six years for other causes.
18 November 2016
The two year window closes
The property had already been sold once, in March 2015, and would be sold again in March 2018.
10 May 2018
The purchaser becomes the registered proprietor
Eighteen months after cover for non-structural defects had ended. He claims in August 2023 and is refused. In July 2025 the County Court awards him $176,297.76. On 6 March 2026 the Court of Appeal sets that aside.

He bought a house whose cover for exactly the kind of defect he would find had already expired, and nothing in the purchase told him.

That is not a loophole. It is what the policy said, and the Court of Appeal has now confirmed how to read it.

02What the policy actually said

Two clauses decided the case, and they sat under a heading that reads almost as a warning.

The policy, as set out in the reasonscll 34 and 35
How long are you covered for?

Non-structural defects
34. This policy covers loss or damage arising from a non-structural defect occurring during the period commencing on the commencement date and ending 2 years after the completion of the work or the date of termination of the building contract, whichever is the earlier.

Other causes
35. This policy covers loss, damage or expense, from a cause other than a non-structural defect, occurring during the period commencing on the commencement date and ending 6 years after the completion of the work or the date of termination of the building contract, whichever is the earlier.
Victorian Building Authority v Fall-Armytage [2026] VSCA 32 at [30]

The tail matters. Cover does not simply run for two or six years from completion. It ends at completion or the date the building contract was terminated, whichever is the earlier. If your builder walked off and the contract was terminated, your clock may have started earlier than you think. We have not seen that mentioned in any coverage of this case.

And then there is the phrase in the middle. "Occurring during the period." Everything turned on what those three words attach to.

03Where the two courts split

A disagreement about grammar with a $176,297.76 consequence.

The County Court

"Occurring" attaches to the defect

  • If the builder built the fault in during construction, the policy responds whenever the damage later appears
  • These defects were created while the work was being done
  • The purchaser is covered
The Court of Appeal

"Occurring" attaches to the loss

  • The question is not when the fault was created but when somebody suffered a loss from it
  • He could not have suffered loss before he owned the house
  • By then the window had shut

The trial judge accepted that the respondent could not have suffered loss or damage before he purchased the property. He simply held that this did not dispose of the claim.

04What the Court of Appeal decided

Niall CJ and McLeish and Whelan JJA[85]
"We will grant leave to appeal and allow the appeal. The orders of the trial judge giving judgment for the plaintiff, and consequential orders including as to costs, should be set aside and in their place there should be orders dismissing the plaintiff's claim, except in relation to the 11th defect, which it remains necessary to classify as structural or non-structural."
Victorian Building Authority v Fall-Armytage [2026] VSCA 32, 6 March 2026

Eleven defects were in issue. The parties accepted that at least ten of them were non-structural, which put them squarely inside the two year clause. The eleventh has gone back to the County Court to be classified, because the Court of Appeal said it was not in a position to decide it on competing expert evidence, adding that given the small amount involved it hoped the issue could be resolved by agreement.

A correction worth making

Almost every account of this case describes it as being about mould and water ingress. It was not. The judgment records at [7] that the respondent withdrew his claims concerning installation of the roof, water ingress, mould and inadequate ventilation. Those were not what the appeal was about.

05You can sue, and still recover nothing

The second holding has had almost no attention, and it may matter more than the first.

When you buy an established home, the builder's statutory warranties come with it. Section 8 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 implies them into the contract, and section 9 carries them to later owners. The purchaser argued that section 9 let him step into the shoes of the original owner. The Court disagreed.

Court of Appeal[82] and [83]
"The result was that the successor in title had to prove its own loss and establish an appropriate causal connection between that loss and the breaches of statutory warranty ... Our conclusion, in relation to the similar Victorian provision, is the same."
Adopting the reasoning on the equivalent New South Wales provision

The Court also quoted Forbes J in Mirvac: "[A] subsequent owner is entitled to damages if a breach of a warranty is established ... That is not to say that a subsequent owner's loss and damage for breach of warranty will necessarily be identical to that of the contracting owner ... Assessment of loss and damage of each owner is a question of fact".

In plain terms: standing is not a remedy. Section 9 gets you through the door. It does not hand you the previous owner's claim. And if you bought the property at a price that already reflected the defects, you may have suffered no recoverable loss at all.

06What this means if you are buying an established home

2 yrs
Non-structural
from completion
6 yrs
Other causes
from completion
18 mths
Window already shut
before he bought
A crack running through a rendered element and opening wider towards the edge, with an inspection probe placed alongside for scale
The kind of defect that surfaces years after handover. Cracking of this sort is usually non-structural, which under the policy considered in this case put it inside the two year clause. Site Inspections photograph, illustrative of the defects described and not the property in this case.

Read those two numbers against how people actually buy houses. A home built and sold, then resold three or four years later, is completely ordinary. So is a defect that takes several years to make itself known.

The window that matters most to a purchaser of an established home is often already closed on the day they get the keys, and there is nothing in a standard conveyance that tells them so.

The practical point is unglamorous. The insurance behind a house is not a substitute for knowing what you are buying. Where the cover has expired, or where you would have to prove your own loss to recover anything, the only thing standing between you and the repair bill is what you knew before you signed.

07What changed on 1 July 2026, and what did not

This decision still governs most homes

Victoria replaced domestic building insurance with Home Warranty on 1 July 2026. If the building contract for your home was signed before that date, you are still on a domestic building insurance policy, and this is how its time limits are now read.

Two things carried across. The new scheme keeps a six year period for major defects and two years for everything else. And under the new Regulations a waterproofing or weatherproofing defect is a major defect, which puts it in the six year window by name. Under the old policy considered in this case, the defects were non-structural and sat in the two year clause.

Our explainer on what Home Warranty covers and for how long sets out the new scheme from the Act and the Regulations.

08What to do

If you are buying an established home in Victoria
  1. Work out the completion date, and do the arithmetic before you bid. Two years and six years both run from completion of the work, not from your settlement. A four year old house has one window closed already.
  2. Ask whether a policy exists and what it covers. A certificate of insurance is a document and it can be produced. Knowing the dates on it is worth more than assuming there is cover.
  3. Get an independent inspection before you sign. It is the only step in the process that tells you the condition of the building rather than the condition of the paperwork, and it is the one that still works after the insurance clock has run out.

A pre-purchase inspection tells you what you are actually buying. The policy behind the house may or may not still be there when you need it.

09Sources

  1. Victorian Building Authority v Fall-Armytage [2026] VSCA 32
    Court of Appeal of Victoria, Niall CJ and McLeish and Whelan JJA, heard 6 February 2026, decided 6 March 2026
  2. Fall-Armytage v Victorian Managed Insurance Authority [2025] VCC 709
    County Court of Victoria, Judge Macnamara, the decision appealed from
  3. Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic), sections 8 and 9
    Statutory warranties, and their passing to successors in title
  4. Domestic Building Insurance Ministerial Order, No S 98, 23 May 2003
    The order under Building Act 1993 s 135 requiring the insurance
  5. Law Library Victoria, Library Bulletin, Issue 4
    19 March 2026 · lawlibrary.vic.gov.au
  6. Building (Statutory Insurance Scheme) Regulations 2026 (Vic), S.R. No. 42/2026, regulations 5 and 8
    The new scheme's definitions and cover periods · legislation.vic.gov.au

Our Blog

YOUR GO-TO RESOURCE HUB

Whether you’re on the hunt or have already settled in, we’ll arm you with the know-how and confidence to keep your home safe and compliant. With our guidance, you can make informed decisions and steer clear of common pitfalls.

SEE ALL